10 Questions:
1. Is it harder to culture jam in today's world of technology? Would culture jamming be as succesful in the vast cyber world of the internet?
2. Is culture jamming still a viable technique or is it a fatigue/exausted method?
3. Is art that holds intellectual property rights for it, truly a piece of art? (because I think it's safe to say that art and our entire culture is developed from the past?
4. If culture and art is off limits, how does that impact the quality and content of future art forms and culture?
5. Does culture jamming on the interent hold the same amount of power as for example disrupting the air waves of the radio or television?
6. with the immergence of the internet, is cuture more controlled or less controlled?
7. Is art off limits?
8. What happens to culture of the future when the public domain becomes privitized and limited by corporate copyright?
9. Is culture jamming of today (youtube) more effective than negativeland's culture jamming in radio broadcasted music?
10. Is culture jamming a proactive method to changing the culture and the power held by the corporations that 'own' that very culture? Does culture jamming have the power to draw enough attention to change the laws that lock up culture?
-Thomas Zukowski
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment